A Comment Could Take Over Your WordPress Site Before You Approved It

Holding comments for approval sounds like a sensible defence. These Events Calendar takeover chains can reach the vulnerable code while the comment is still pending.
Vulnerabilities, defensive security, architecture and operational security.

Holding comments for approval sounds like a sensible defence. These Events Calendar takeover chains can reach the vulnerable code while the comment is still pending.

A forged token hit the wrong product in a honeypot. Replayed against vulnerable WSO2 software, it worked. An old patch now deserves a fresh look at the gateway protecting your APIs.

A corporate security block did not always end the conversation. A joint advisory describes attackers asking targets to open disguised malware on personal devices instead, where the exposure can extend beyond work data.

The upload handler checked a permitted-file list supplied by the person uploading the file. Wordfence says attackers have been exploiting that mistake for months, despite a fix being available.

Installing the replacement was not enough: the developer says a second intrusion compromised it too. Site owners need a recovery decision, not another green update badge.
Google's September bulletin flags possible targeted exploitation of a Pixel modem flaw, now also listed in CISA's exploited-vulnerability catalogue. The useful check is the installed patch level.

The backup integration behind a hosting control panel has an exploited Linux privilege-escalation flaw. An attacker needs a local foothold first, but that is not where the risk ends.

The browser can load the malicious extension as though you approved it. Elastic's KREMLIN investigation shows why a familiar banking document can become an endpoint and session-security problem.

The platform deciding who may enter your network has an exploited login bypass. Patching Cisco ISE closes the flaw, but deciding whether a node can still be trusted takes a separate investigation.

Ace & Tate has confirmed that customer contact, order and delivery details were copied from logistics partner CEVA. The fields can make delivery scams more convincing even though payment data and passwords were not involved.